Post by firoj1616 on Feb 15, 2024 5:43:38 GMT -6
A report by Valor Econômico informs that the Ministry of Labor issued an ordinance on March 28th that promises to spark controversy regarding the reduction of rest and meal breaks for company employees. Ordinance 42 provides that the period may be reduced by convention or collective agreement. Until then, and in accordance with the CLT, the reduction was only permitted, case by case, by act of the ministry itself through the regional labor police stations (DRTs), which should approve the conditions of the cafeterias and monitor whether employees are not subjected to overtime work regimes. Back to Supreme The Civil Construction Industry Union (Sinduscon) of the State of São Paulo will again take to the Federal Supreme Court the discussion on the increase in the Cofins rate from 2% to 3%, made through Law.
The union claims that it has new arguments to be assessed and that were not discussed by the court ministers in the judgment on the case, in 2005. That year, the Supreme Court considered the increase in the rate to be constitutional and only the expansion of the PIS calculation base to be unconstitutional. /Cofins, reports Valor Econômico . Cofins credits The Federal Revenue New Zealand Email List published an interpretative declaratory act that guides how companies should use PIS and Cofins credits to calculate Income Tax (IR) and Social Contribution on Net Profit (CSLL). As a result, taxpayers, in theory, are now “obliged” to follow the Revenue’s recommendation, at the risk of being fined. The discussion, however, does not end for those who disagree with the understanding, which has already been taken to the Judiciary.
In practice, Declaratory Act 3 of the Federal Revenue establishes that contribution credits must be accounted for in the IR and CSLL calculation basis. The information is from Valor Econômico . Donations in elections According to a report by the DCI , the Federal Revenue Service, with the aim of checking possible fraud and evasion in political campaigns, will cross-check the data provided in the income tax form by taxpayers to candidates with the declarations of donations made in the 2006 electoral campaign. The offensive will begin soon, as the declaration will have to be submitted by the 30th. If the omission of the donation is proven, the company may have to pay a fine to the IRS for omitting an amount and runs the risk of being held criminally liable. by the act, explains lawyer Rodrigo Lázaro Pinto, specialist in Political Law at Maluly Jr.
The union claims that it has new arguments to be assessed and that were not discussed by the court ministers in the judgment on the case, in 2005. That year, the Supreme Court considered the increase in the rate to be constitutional and only the expansion of the PIS calculation base to be unconstitutional. /Cofins, reports Valor Econômico . Cofins credits The Federal Revenue New Zealand Email List published an interpretative declaratory act that guides how companies should use PIS and Cofins credits to calculate Income Tax (IR) and Social Contribution on Net Profit (CSLL). As a result, taxpayers, in theory, are now “obliged” to follow the Revenue’s recommendation, at the risk of being fined. The discussion, however, does not end for those who disagree with the understanding, which has already been taken to the Judiciary.
In practice, Declaratory Act 3 of the Federal Revenue establishes that contribution credits must be accounted for in the IR and CSLL calculation basis. The information is from Valor Econômico . Donations in elections According to a report by the DCI , the Federal Revenue Service, with the aim of checking possible fraud and evasion in political campaigns, will cross-check the data provided in the income tax form by taxpayers to candidates with the declarations of donations made in the 2006 electoral campaign. The offensive will begin soon, as the declaration will have to be submitted by the 30th. If the omission of the donation is proven, the company may have to pay a fine to the IRS for omitting an amount and runs the risk of being held criminally liable. by the act, explains lawyer Rodrigo Lázaro Pinto, specialist in Political Law at Maluly Jr.